[BWD] Nefarian
[BWD] Nefarian
'Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?'
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Anyone who wants to come to Nef on 10 man needs to watch this, I will be checking that you have (I have ways of knowing, mwahahahaaa)
'Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?'
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Some alternate strategy 4 phase 1 ... not sure it's wired, but mayb worth a try
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEO9LEN5cvY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEO9LEN5cvY
-
- Guest
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
That what i was doing at our first tries when i have onyx but i was little slow at start on turing herFagan wrote: Anyone who wants to come to Nef on 10 man needs to watch this, I will be checking that you have (I have ways of knowing, mwahahahaaa)
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Mahmoud wrote:Some alternate strategy 4 phase 1 ... not sure it's wired, but mayb worth a try
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEO9LEN5cvY
Looks interesting, might be worth a try.
'Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?'
-
- Member
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 5:41 pm
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
I'm sure there are many strategies available, but does not Fagans video suggest that we should not use frost traps for adds on P3? (at 7.22)
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Which one? The video in the first post or second post?
'Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?'
-
- Member
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 5:41 pm
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
The later one. Maybe different between 10 and 25
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Yeah, only having 5/6 adds in 10 they will be very easy for the tank to control without CC. Having to deal with 12 of them makes things a lot more difficult.
'Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?'
-
- Member
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 5:41 pm
Re: [BWD] Nefarian
Found the nef 25 add kiting thread on maintankadin:
http://maintankadin.failsafedesign.com/ ... 43&t=30687
Just quickly skimmed through it but is it seems like people prefer not using slows in order to more easily keep them grouped. I suppose it's easy to get them spread out more when using slows. (easy to have theories when I have not tried myself )
http://maintankadin.failsafedesign.com/ ... 43&t=30687
Just quickly skimmed through it but is it seems like people prefer not using slows in order to more easily keep them grouped. I suppose it's easy to get them spread out more when using slows. (easy to have theories when I have not tried myself )
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest